dupeddonk

On average the 26x hits every 223 drops and the 130x once every 2,048 drops. Going 2000 drops without hitting either is kind of unlucky, but really no reason to cry.

Being able to objectively and independently verify outcomes it what makes the process work. So how about you share that Limbo seed pair and let me take a look and see how it compares to those graphs you posted in the other thread as well. If they both match you'll get a double apology. I think I found the site you got the crash data from. It's a cool idea, but I can't find the code he's using - are you aware of it being public anywhere? Would make things easier if it's already out there. And if it's not, well - you don't really know how accurate it is.

You're not alone in not understanding. But, why shouldn't it be possible to get half your money back 17 times in a row? You need to take a lot more than 17 bets into consideration to get an idea of the RTP. For high variance games, more bets than you will ever make. You might want to quit buying the same bonus over and over if it's pissing you off that much.

This keeps happening, and it will keep happening. I'm going to be optimistic and hope that the higher ups just haven't been made aware of whats going on, and when they do they will fix it and tell support to stop giving such a pathetic response when it happens in the future.

Figured out how to do it, will let you know when I actually sit down and do. (I'll post it on github with instructions)

That could be true (although I doubt it since it just doesn't make sense) for some providers that aren't licensed anywhere reputable (like curacao), but it's definitely not true when it comes to the more respected regulators (many of the providers stake works with are). I don't know what you mean by 'that RTP stuff', but slots have an RTP, that's what determine what % of each wager is paid back to players in the long run. That's how slots work. Look up The Technical Services Bureau Slot Lab, part of the New Jersey Dept of Gaming Enforcement . They have a lot of information publicly available on the process used to insure the integrity of a game. Trying to 'get around' them would be a very expensive mistake.

ROULETTE: 59,399,787,297 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00002606 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00002606 ROULETTE: 59,399,786,151 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00002482 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00002482 ROULETTE: 59,399,785,256 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00002364 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00002364 ROULETTE: 59,399,784,310 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00002251 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00002251 ROULETTE: 59,399,783,440 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00002144 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00002144 ROULETTE: 59,399,782,064 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00002042 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00002042 ROULETTE: 59,399,781,167 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00001945 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00001945 ROULETTE: 59,399,780,192 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00001852 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00001852 ROULETTE: 59,399,779,154 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00001764 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00001764 ROULETTE: 59,399,778,306 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00001680 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00001680 ROULETTE: 59,399,777,442 placed by dupeddonk on 21/10/2021 Wagered 0.00001600 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00001600

Good idea, would like to see a Diamonds challenge (crash or slide would be fun too). Another Diamonds option would be longest winning streak, like the roulette one.

monopoly

casino:59139848512

In case support responds with something that doesn't make any sense, try disabling all your browser extensions, if that doesn't work you might want to uninstall chrome, delete all browsing data, and then (if using windows) delete the Chrome directory located: ~\Users\(your username)\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome (I think it's hidden). Then reinstall chrome.

Ahh, of course. You just don't want to reveal the server seed that would validate the graph you posted last July. I think the real reason is that if you did, it would prove your graph was bogus. Of course, you refusing to do so only supports that argument. I don't care about the act of changing your seed. I just want to give you the opportunity to prove you aren't posting bogus graphs to convince people Stake is scamming people and make sure the community is aware of the whole thing so they can keep the way you're responding in mind when reading your future posts.

I will absolutely apologize if it turns out you haven't been dishonest. I already wrote a scripts to verify your data from the last thread you started with your limbo graph, but you've so far refused to share your seed pair. I haven't gotten around to verifying this graph, but I will. In the mean time we could easily clear up the last graph, just post the seed pair - I already wrote the code, and it's open source.

dupeddonk blue

The outcome is determined before you decide how much to bet.