Jump to content
Stake Forum

lolipant

Member
  • Content Count

    272
  • Joined

Everything posted by lolipant

  1. 17 BLACKJACK: 8,753,478,265 placed by boobs on 10/09/2019 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00000100 18 BLACKJACK: 8,754,127,933 placed by boobs on 10/09/2019 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00000100 19 BLACKJACK: 8,754,188,893 placed by boobs on 10/09/2019 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00000100 20 BLACKJACK: 8,754,230,526 placed by boobs on 10/09/2019 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00000100 21 BLACKJACK: 8,754,363,042 placed by boobs on 10/09/2019 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00000100
  2. 1. mine MINES: 1,315,368,433 placed by boobs on 04/11/2018 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 24.75x Profit 0.00002375 2. hi-lo HILO: 1,315,389,347 placed by boobs on 04/11/2018 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 4.37595x Profit 0.00000338
  3. so it's basically a lottery?
  4. another solution: an accept/decline tip button, and an option to disable that function (if disable, it will accept all tip)
  5. i have made a quick excel for that (the payout ...x may seems off a bit but it is just visual, the cashout amount is corrected) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bXbuZYxY80OnD48ZsD1i57vPAOECSEodRzLQaRVErg4/edit#gid=1361250624 if 21 card isn't enough, you can drag the lastest 3 block to add more (aside from the first set, which have different function than other)
  6. you can hover over it to see the chance
  7. i think the original idea is pretty abuseable (bet with 0 sat for example), and isn't hard to get to begin with (see the recent ouija challenge, that's 3 number in a row) so instead of fixed number and payout, base the reward from profit and multiplier (or how rare it is) would be better something like this: Dice - win at least 500x multiplier Chartbet - cash out at least 500x Mines - win at least 500x Plinko - catch the last pin (left or right) on 14 or 16 pins game (any risk) Keno - catch at least 8 hits Roulette - catch the same number at least 3 times in a row Hi-Lo - win at least 500x Blackjack - win by open at least 7 cards on a hand Diamond Poker - win by 5 of a kind the payout is % base on the payout you actually get from the bet (so the game like blackjack or diamond poker would give you low amount while the 500x requirement give you high amount) Jackpot in a row (the low% bonus due to it affected house edge, give higher amount would be bad for the site) 1 jackpot : 5% bonus 2 jackpots : 12.5% bonus 3 jackpots : 20% bonus 4 jackpots : 30% bonus 5 jackpots : 40% bonus etc.
  8. ♣ BLACKJACK: 1,146,745,007 placed by boobs on 22/10/2018 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00000300 ♦ BLACKJACK: 1,146,808,178 placed by boobs on 22/10/2018 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00000300 ♥ BLACKJACK: 1,147,000,606 placed by boobs on 22/10/2018 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00000300 ♠ BLACKJACK: 1,146,904,728 placed by boobs on 22/10/2018 Wagered 0.00000100 Multiplier 2x Profit 0.00000300
  9. the problem with martingale is 1. in the end it will have the same chance for risk and reward than when you bet normally 2. you'd actually performing worse than betting normally since you can't optimize every bet to the best amount (if you didn't using script or re-adjust every hand) 3. the house payout cap or your balance cap let's say you have 1 btc and want a 2 btc as a goal. normally if you go all-in in dice for 2x, you'd have a 49.5% chance to get that (or lose all money) then if you're using martingale, let's say you're up to 12 losing streak, the initial amount would be ~24,420 satoshi, and those would give you a 0.028% chance to lose pre bet per chain of bet if you're using the same payout setting (which if we divide those by 1, it would give you an average 3635 roll until you hit the busted streak) let's say we run auto at 24420 sat for 1800 roll (which is half of expected roll to busted), it would give you a 24420*2*49.5%*1800 = 43,516,440 sat, which is about 57% less than expected value of 1 btc we'd get from the same risk of going all-in why it is lower? well, because you need to re-adjust the bet amount every time you win for optimal amount if you want the same risk and reward when you going all-in, which defeated the purpose of setting an auto-bet in the first place i do post the fine-tune bet script for martingale in Seuntjie dicebot's topic tho, check it if you're interested but i'm not using it since bet it manually is more fun to me than just watch the bot roll and then busted (wrote the script is fun part tho)
  10. using the bot is allowed by stake. but using the bot made by someone else is entirely your responsible to take the risk, if anything happened to your account
  11. there's those already, you could use react as haha or thanks for upvote, and lame for downvote.
  12. isn't this meant we have to take a full risk (no support from stake anymore) but are allowed to post in off-topic (or whatever forum) instead?
  13. i play only one account, however i'll preroll until the inevitable losing streak is gone then i'll play it for real or change to other game when i found the trend on the seed. since some bad roll on one game may be the good roll on another game oh and learn to get the feeling of how the seed/nonce works help me a lot at that i do use bank account tho, i guess that make me play on 2 accounts? (altho i didn't bet on the bank account)
  14. i tidy the code in my previous post up a bit to make it easier to input the number if anyone interested
  15. it should hold the amount when user create the trivia, and returned it if user cancel (but in case of cancel it should also have message tell everyone in chat), and make it so the user who create the trivia can do other thing while it is running (not have to just sit waiting for the corrected answer or play in another tab)
  16. a middleman bot between two user (fees 0.5% each) is fine as well, while both can put in a required amount from each other
  17. another script i planned to write 1. random 5-49.5% chance as the first bet 2. if lose, switch into a random 2.01-2.99 payout for the next roll 3. if lose again increased the payout to 3.xx, 4.xx, 5.xx til reached 9.xx 4. then it will start martingale from the last 9.xx til busted or hit the limit chance = math.random(1, 4950)/100 if win then xxx elseif currentstreak <= -1 and currentstreak >= -9 chance = bla bla from [ payout = -1*currentstreak+1 + something somthing from last chance between 0.01-0.99 ] else margingale bla lba til maxred
  18. i can just click enroll to keep it forever right?
  19. is this still in development? it sound interesting
  20. there are many third party verifier, in this topic also have some
  21. it only show winning bet, i check his recent bet with api and he losing a lot (all bet is 10k) since he use ghost mode i won't revealed his name, but from what i see it's pretty normal
  22. martingale doesn't going good with diamond poker, since 1.5x will ruined it even if you doesn't hit the long red and busted
  23. it is very easy to use you just need to put in your username, api copy from stake (which will act as a permission token to login and bet) and 2fa if you're using it (no need for password) tho i preferred write the script myself because it's easier for me to use than a preset one it is very similar to stake autobet with a betting system build-in so it shouldn't be hard to figure it out
  24. there's no real "low risk" because with every possibly strategy, it will come back to one thing: house edge. if you want to double your balance, with ANY strategy, the final chance stay the same: 49.5% (on 1% house edge) the low risk actually just a slow bet, instead of fast bet (which is equal to all-in and hope for double)
×