Jump to content

Higher or Lower minimum rain amounts: Vote now!


sleepyW
 Share

Raise min rain amount in chat? or leave it as it is.... What do you think?  

74 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the new min rain amount per person? Or do you think they should be raised higher

    • Leave the rain amount minimums as they are now
      27
    • Raise the minimum rain amounts
      47


Featured Comment

There's been a lot of debate lately as to the newer minimum rainbot structure amounts in chat recently. I'm not sure any of us even as a group have much say in whether they would change it or not, but I'm curious to see how many people would prefer it be raised back up compared to how many prefer it should be left at the min amounts that it currently is.  I see much debate in chat regarding frustration due to "missing regular or large rains due to catching small min rains", as well as people even getting upset and reminding others to be grateful for anything that they receive based it being a gift and not required.  It seems to be creating somewhat of a divide and raising tensions. So I've created a poll just to see how many people in fact prefer which side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

The "missing regular or large rains due to catching small min rains" argument isn't a valid one.

Rainbot doesn't go through a list in order, I don't think.  So your chances of catching the next rain are the same regardless of when your last catch was.

Even if your last catch was a factor in your next one, it still woudn't be a valid argument since the spam rains are just as likely to help you catch a big rain as they are to prevent you from catching one. 

Edited by dupeddonk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Mainxbeer said:

I think it is better to raise them as it becomes a spam once ppl start dropping 5 cent rains and there is not really much that someone can do with 5 cents. It is good for ppl who are not deposittinh

I lean to agree here, I think constant rains tend to freeze chat and slow game play, (course I'm not gona say I mind if they're big ones- I don't think anyone minds that hahha) but to have constant nickel rains spammed thru chat incessantly is quite spammy.. And I also agree, that the extra low amount per player rains, tend to cater much more toward non depositing players...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think minimum should be at least $5 and I think that’s still considerably a small amount. If it got rained to 25 players which is currently the max amount of players who can receive rain will all get 20 cents each and if sent with the default 10 people that’s 50 cents each. Currently it’s so small and causes so much spam that the players who received rain tries to say thanks to the person who made it rain ends up in a accidental mute or something. The chat goes beyond wild when it rains and creates a lot of lag, well at least for me it does and anyone who was having a normal conversation with someone else will no longer be able to chat. That’s just my opinion though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kg562 said:

I think minimum should be at least $5 and I think that’s still considerably a small amount. If it got rained to 25 players which is currently the max amount of players who can receive rain will all get 20 cents each and if sent with the default 10 people that’s 50 cents each. Currently it’s so small and causes so much spam that the players who received rain tries to say thanks to the person who made it rain ends up in a accidental mute or something. The chat goes beyond wild when it rains and creates a lot of lag, well at least for me it does and anyone who was having a normal conversation with someone else will no longer be able to chat. That’s just my opinion though. 

100% Perfect 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/29/2021 at 7:33 AM, sleepyW said:

I lean to agree here, I think constant rains tend to freeze chat and slow game play, (course I'm not gona say I mind if they're big ones- I don't think anyone minds that hahha) but to have constant nickel rains spammed thru chat incessantly is quite spammy.. And I also agree, that the extra low amount per player rains, tend to cater much more toward non depositing players...

Well, non depositors can't receive rain, bud... You have to have wagered minimum $2K in the past 7 days in order to be eligible to receive rain.  So the only thing that it caters to when it comes to the non depositing is that it keeps them non depositing.. lol.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PoserDispozr4 said:

Well, non depositors can't receive rain, bud... You have to have wagered minimum $2K in the past 7 days in order to be eligible to receive rain.  So the only thing that it caters to when it comes to the non depositing is that it keeps them non depositing.. lol.. 

actually this is false,, anyone that wagers 2k in the last 7 days is eligible, no matter whether they've deposited or not. They need 100$ wager to be able to chat, once theyre able to chat, if they get 1 successful beg msg in there, they can wager enough to collect on rains if they hava clue as to wagering. 2k is not that difficult to wager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PoserDispozr4 said:

Well, non depositors can't receive rain, bud... You have to have wagered minimum $2K in the past 7 days in order to be eligible to receive rain.  So the only thing that it caters to when it comes to the non depositing is that it keeps them non depositing.. lol.. 

Brother there can be tips and bonuses they get and can wager 2k. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AnnieGrace said:

It doesn't matter what size drops fly in chat, do you come to the casino to win or collect rains? Strange topic for discussion. Better to talk about working strategies of the game.

i think you may be missing the point of why many want larger minimums, its because its causing massive amounts of spam, as well as bringing in beggars n rainfarmers by the hundreds..... we're not really talking about collection lol,, tho many feel that it decreases their chance to get larger rains based on "collecting" smaller rains haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2021 at 8:32 AM, jeorel137 said:

If they set the minimum rain higher expect that some stakers will not do rain drop unless a very big win

I'd be perfectly ok with this, and also I'm not talking about raising it to large amount (maybe 5$ min or something, or at least limiting the number of recipients for minimums maybe)  but 1$ to 25 ppl i think is causing obscene amounts of spam and is virtually pointless 

 

On 5/3/2021 at 8:26 PM, Mahnoor1 said:

This is free money atleast better then nothing 

Is it really though? As I'm a pretty regular member in the chat community, I for one would much rather have a functioning, NONfrozen, (spamless would be inconceivable but with less spam would be nice)..... than $0.04 cents --shrugs--     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rains, bonues, prizes .....etc are extra money if u start to look it as yr income than your game standard is getting decreased day by day

do plan, focus on profit n let them come [rains,bonues........] as they are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ashesh074 said:

rains, bonues, prizes .....etc are extra money if u start to look it as yr income than your game standard is getting decreased day by day

do plan, focus on profit n let them come [rains,bonues........] as they are

I don't believe anyone at all is looking at rains as any kind of income, at all. That's not what this is about, nor is it a reason for wanting higher/lower ones hahha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...